MAN’S BIGGEST NEMESIS

The question behind men & women’s relationships is a structural one that precedes today’s societies.The argument about the structural identity of male & female is not a legal argument about how people should be treated within the bonds of the relationship but the structure. Rather, men & women tend to make it about whether heterosexual or homosexual relationships should be identified as having the structure of a marriage, and only after that can civil rights considerations emerge about how citizens should be treated fairly with respect to a relationship or marriage. Those who want homosexual relationships to be redefined as marriages say that many aspects of their relationships are like marriage-having sexual play, living together, loving one another, etc.-and therefore they should be allowed to call their relationships marriages and should be recognized in the law as marriage partners. But this cannot be a proper legal matter until the case has been made that a homosexual partnership and a marriage are indistinguishable. Otherwise, the appeal amounts to nothing more than a request that homosexual partners be allowed to call themselves what they want to call themselves regardless of the differences that exist in reality under the naturalization act. The answer they want is for the law to make and adjudicating authorities to change the law based on the principle that reality is defined by the will and declarations of the individuals, not as it is thru all of whom should be treated without discrimination. But here, in the relationship between a natural man & woman you see that the greater appeal constantly being made not an appeal for judges and lawmakers to reconsider past experimental judgments about similarities between heterosexual and homosexual relationships, but simply for the creation of man and woman in the 'Creation of Love' relationship to learn how to learn to exist on the only physical planet in the seven layer universe called earth.