Efficient Innovation in an Inefficient System

A national intelligence field site recently implemented the processes outlined in 'Dealing with Darwin' by Geoffrey A. Moore. The results are promising and indicate a potential for expansion of the methodology to other national intelligence locations. Moore provides a corporate guide to sustain 'competitive advantage' encouraging continuous efficiency and innovation. Air Force Chief of Staff Schwartz in February 2012 outlined the Air Force priorities for a new strategy with a constrained budget, and specifically cited 'Innovation and adaptability are essential strengths. The current fiscal environment demands prioritization that permits continued national security. The looming projected budget cuts drive this generation of leadership to stop doing something vice the past two decades of consistent 'peanut butter spread' or 'more-with-less' processes. Although current DoD leadership is expressing the requirement to eliminate entire programs, it is a significant challenge based on bureaucratic history, and Congressional interest that traditionally influences strategic cuts preventing elimination of specific programs. Within the intelligence realm, the ability of a unit to identify programs of value and articulate their worth and priority is complex. Especially considering intelligence is 'probable' by its very nature and consequently is vague in relative value and cost until after an event.This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.