Librería Samer Atenea
Librería Aciertas (Toledo)
Kálamo Books
Librería Perelló (Valencia)
Librería Elías (Asturias)
Donde los libros
Librería Kolima (Madrid)
Librería Proteo (Málaga)
查核亚当斯密的一生， 他果然是一位哲学先行的'经济学家'！ 就像一百年后的卡尔马克思一样。所以他的《国富论》缺乏宗教观念， 不是偶然的失误， 而是故意的躲避。由此看来， 亚当斯密像卡尔马克思一样， 概念先行， 没有'尊重事实的科学态度'。美国经济学家斯考森认为， 如果说亚当·斯密是'天赋自由体系的大创造者'， 那么， 马克思就是'它的大毁灭者'。1998 年诺奖获得者阿马蒂亚·森（ Amartya Sen） 却不这么看， 他在论述'市场和自由'这一问题时， 则非常肯定地说: '事实上， 马克思反对前资本主义劳动关系的不自由和对资本主义的肯定性评论与这个问题完全相关。'有人认为， 在这一问题上， 森对马克思的理解应该是正确的。马克思和恩格斯在《共产党宣言》中就曾明确地将那些站在封建专制和小生产的立场上'用诅咒异端邪说的传统办法诅咒自由主义'、'诅咒资产阶级的竞争'和'自由和平等'的所谓德国的'真正的'社会主义， 称之为'反动的社会主义'。我看事实正好相反--亚当斯密与卡尔马克思其实是一丘之貉， 不是由于马克思的自由主义， 而是由于亚当斯密的唯物主义。所以， '大创造者'亚当斯密和'大毁灭者'卡尔马克思之间， 应该是一种师徒关系。Content SummaryCheck Adam Smith’s life, he is indeed an 'economist' who is ahead of philosophy! Like Karl Marx a hundred years later. Therefore, the lack of religious concepts in his 'The Wealth of Nations' is not an accidental mistake, but a deliberate avoidance. From this point of view, Adam Smith, like Karl Marx, put concepts first and did not have a 'scientific attitude that respects facts.'American economist Skosen believes that if Adam Smith is 'the great creator of the natural liberty system', then Marx is 'its great destroyer'. Amartya Sen, the Nobel laureate in 1998, did not see it that way. When he discussed the issue of 'markets and freedom', he said very positively: 'In fact, Marx opposed the pre-capitalist labor Unfreedom of relations and affirmative comments on capitalism are entirely relevant to this question.' It has been argued that Sen’s understanding of Marx should be correct on this issue. In the 'Communist Manifesto', Marx and Engels clearly stated that those who stand on the standpoint of feudal autocracy and small production 'curse liberalism with the traditional method of cursing heresy', 'curse the competition of the bourgeoisie' and 'freedom and equality'. 'The so-called 'true' socialism in Germany is called 'reactionary socialism'.I think the opposite is true-Adam Smith and Karl Marx are really the same species, not because of Marx’s liberalism, but because of Adam Smith’s materialism. Therefore, there should be a master-student relationship between the 'great creator' Adam Smith and the 'great destroyer' Karl Marx.
