Francis William Newman / Henry Rogers
Librería Samer Atenea
Librería Aciertas (Toledo)
Kálamo Books
Librería Perelló (Valencia)
Librería Elías (Asturias)
Donde los libros
Librería Kolima (Madrid)
Librería Proteo (Málaga)
In 'A Defence of ’The Eclipse of Faith’', the author, H. Rogers, presents a detailed rejoinder to Professor F.W. Newman’s critique, which appeared in Newman’s work 'Phases of Faith'. This volume delves into the heart of Victorian-era religious debate, addressing fundamental questions about faith, reason, and the nature of religious belief. Rogers meticulously dissects Newman’s arguments, offering a robust defense of his original positions as presented in 'The Eclipse of Faith'. The book provides valuable insights into the intellectual climate of the time, showcasing the tensions between traditional religious views and emerging scientific and philosophical perspectives. It remains relevant to scholars interested in the history of religious thought, apologetics, and the development of religious criticism in the 19th century. Readers will appreciate the depth of engagement and the clarity with which Rogers articulates his defense, making this a compelling read for anyone interested in the ongoing dialogue between faith and skepticism.This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.